IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v31y2010i5p523-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How far can the residualisation of council housing debate be applied to the private-rental sector in Northern Ireland?

Author

Listed:
  • Paddy Gray
  • Ursula McAnulty

Abstract

The private-rented sector (PRS) in Northern Ireland has witnessed a decline for most of the twentieth century. At the beginning of the last century approximately 90% of households rented privately, but by 1991 only 5% of the total stock was privately rented, representing 28,600 dwellings. However, since 1991 the sector has steadily increased, and by 2004 the PRS represented 9.2% (62,500 dwellings) of the total dwelling stock, an increase of 120%. In Britain, there has been much debate about the residualisation of council housing with a focus on how lower-income households have been increasingly located in council housing with the more affluent being encouraged into owner-occupation, changing the social profile of council housing. This article, however, will seek to examine the impact the recent growth of the PRS has had on the socio-economic profile of housing estates in Northern Ireland and the tenure transfer that has taken place within these estates. The article examines current trends in the more ‘settled’ housing estates in Northern Ireland, and argues that a process of residualisation is emerging within these areas as a result of the changing nature of the PRS.

Suggested Citation

  • Paddy Gray & Ursula McAnulty, 2010. "How far can the residualisation of council housing debate be applied to the private-rental sector in Northern Ireland?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 523-538.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:31:y:2010:i:5:p:523-538
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2010.495901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2010.495901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2010.495901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:31:y:2010:i:5:p:523-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.