IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v29y2008i4p405-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace effects of equal employment opportunity legislation: the Australian experience

Author

Listed:
  • David Peetz
  • Margaret Gardner
  • Kerry Brown
  • Sandra Berns

Abstract

Establishing whether legislation promotes better equity outcomes than non-mandated, voluntaristic instruments such as self-regulation or peer regulation has been difficult. Findings of an Australian survey comparing equity policies and outcomes in those workplaces that are regulated by employment equity legislation with those that are not subject to legislative provisions are presented. Research findings showed equity indicators were strongest in those workplaces covered by the legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Peetz & Margaret Gardner & Kerry Brown & Sandra Berns, 2008. "Workplace effects of equal employment opportunity legislation: the Australian experience," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 405-419.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:405-419
    DOI: 10.1080/01442870802482158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442870802482158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442870802482158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:405-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.