IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v22y2001i3-4p181-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mechanics of 'Failure' in Further Education: The Case of Bilston Community College

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Goddard-Patel
  • Stephen Whitehead

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of the 'failing' further education (FE) college. It does so through a detailed examination of the circumstances, mechanics and financial consequences behind one of the most prominent FE college 'failures' since incorporation of the FE sector in April 1993 - Bilston Community College. When Bilston apparently 'failed' it was castigated by the Labour government as an example of what happens when managements, governors and staff 'fail' to perform, and the college was duly closed in 1999 with many losses of both course provision and staff. In undertaking this examination, the paper details the relationship between the ubiquitous market ideology abroad in FE, the role of the former Further Education Funding Council, (retrospective) government policies, and some of the financial implications of closing an FE college. We conclude that the 'naming and shaming' policy initiated by the current government was at best a disingenuous response and at worst counterproductive in addressing what is a very real and continuing crisis within the UK post-compulsory education sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Goddard-Patel & Stephen Whitehead, 2001. "The Mechanics of 'Failure' in Further Education: The Case of Bilston Community College," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3-4), pages 181-195.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:22:y:2001:i:3-4:p:181-195
    DOI: 10.1080/01442870120112683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442870120112683
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442870120112683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:22:y:2001:i:3-4:p:181-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.