IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v42y2024i8p695-713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevailing wages, school construction costs, and bids by out-of-state contractors: evidence from the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Duncan
  • Adam Case
  • Frank Manzo IV

Abstract

In the United States, prevailing wage laws authorize minimum remuneration by locality and occupation for public construction. The policy’s goal of leveling the playing field between local and lower wage, nonlocal builders is shared by fair wage policies in Canada and posted worker rules in the European Union. This is the first paper to test if the wage policy reduces bid disparities between these two types of contractors. The statistical analysis of over 600 subcontractor bids for schools built within the Minnesota’s largest metropolitan area examines differences in low, winning bids between Minnesota-based contractors and those from neighboring states with lower average construction wages. Findings indicate that prevailing wage requirements substantially reduce bid disparity between in- and out-of-state subcontractors. Additional results illustrate estimation issues related to measuring the influence of prevailing wage laws and unionized construction labor on construction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Duncan & Adam Case & Frank Manzo IV, 2024. "Prevailing wages, school construction costs, and bids by out-of-state contractors: evidence from the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 695-713, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:42:y:2024:i:8:p:695-713
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2024.2314079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2024.2314079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2024.2314079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:42:y:2024:i:8:p:695-713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.