IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v40y2022i3p173-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic collaboration in managing existing buildings in New Zealand's state schools: school managers' perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • An Thi Hoai Le
  • Niluka Domingo
  • Eziaku Rasheed
  • Kenneth Park

Abstract

Collaboration has been considered one of the keys for effectively managing state school properties in New Zealand, with participants combining their abilities to solve challenges and achieve common goals. However, this is challenging due to the multiple stakeholders involved (Ministry staff, external consultants, school boards), process fragmentation, and the stakeholders’ diversity of knowledge. This research aims to develop a collaboration maturity model with process areas, criteria in each process area and rating levels. The criteria were identified from interviews with school managers and then used in a questionnaire survey to investigate the maturity levels of criteria in the collaboration. The assessment results provide insights into the problems or lowest scores criteria that are most needed for improvement. Based on the findings, improvement initiatives have been discussed. From school managers’ perspective, the empirical findings can be translated into actionable knowledge in a way that helps the top management review their collaboration policies regarding staff training, funding allocation, reporting system and information technology.

Suggested Citation

  • An Thi Hoai Le & Niluka Domingo & Eziaku Rasheed & Kenneth Park, 2022. "Strategic collaboration in managing existing buildings in New Zealand's state schools: school managers' perspectives," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 173-185, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:40:y:2022:i:3:p:173-185
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2022.2027486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2022.2027486
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2022.2027486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:40:y:2022:i:3:p:173-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.