IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v39y2021i2p99-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can multiple contractors self-regulate their joint service delivery? A serious gaming experiment on road maintenance planning

Author

Listed:
  • Joris Scharpff
  • Daan Schraven
  • Leentje Volker
  • Matthijs T. J. Spaan
  • Mathijs M. de Weerdt

Abstract

The next step in the use of innovative, dynamic and performance-based contracts for service delivery by contractors could be use of monetary incentives to stimulate self-regulation of the network. Because it is currently unclear how performance-based payments in network tenders can effectively encourage network members to coordinate their own operations, a serious game was performed that simulates road maintenance planning to study changes in decision making and the emergence of network coordination. The experiments show that monetary incentives influence decision making, but their effect may be opposite to their intended aim and can lead to a competitive network. It was, however, also found that this competitiveness is not shown in networks where members are familiar with each other. This leads to the conclusion that penalty-based incentive mechanisms probably interfere with self-regulation and that the social dimension of contractor collaboration is paramount to the success of network-based contracting of construction activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joris Scharpff & Daan Schraven & Leentje Volker & Matthijs T. J. Spaan & Mathijs M. de Weerdt, 2021. "Can multiple contractors self-regulate their joint service delivery? A serious gaming experiment on road maintenance planning," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 99-116, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:99-116
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2020.1806336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2020.1806336
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2020.1806336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:99-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.