IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v38y2020i7p623-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationales and practices for dynamic stakeholder engagement and disengagement. Evidence from dementia-friendly health and social care environments

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Pascale
  • Efthimia Pantzartzis
  • Ilias Krystallis
  • Andrew D. F. Price

Abstract

Latest developments in stakeholder management literature focus on dynamic stakeholder engagement and disengagement practices, and how these are facilitated towards reaching systemic outcomes. However, limited evidence support that this network-level approach can positively influence project success. The paper analyses this issue by considering the practices (how and when), rationales (why) and outcomes (so what) that evolve in the dynamic management of external stakeholders in dementia-friendly environments. This is a crucial area to explore as the ageing population and rising dementia prevalence has increased the need to engage external stakeholders, such as people living with dementia, to develop dementia-friendly health and social environments. The empirical study of the 2013/2014 Department of Health National Dementia Capital Investment Programme involved a statistical and qualitative analysis of 98 pilot projects’ final lessons learnt reports. The analysis advances the dynamic process of timely engaging and disengaging external stakeholders in a context not previously explored in the literature related to dementia-friendly environments. Eight recurring practices and six rationales, the latter characterized by their temporal dimension, are presented in a processual model of stakeholder management.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Pascale & Efthimia Pantzartzis & Ilias Krystallis & Andrew D. F. Price, 2020. "Rationales and practices for dynamic stakeholder engagement and disengagement. Evidence from dementia-friendly health and social care environments," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 623-639, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:7:p:623-639
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2019.1679383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2019.1679383
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2019.1679383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:7:p:623-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.