IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v38y2020i3p239-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highly effective companies in supplier quality surveillance practices: a quantitative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Thaís da C. L. Alves
  • Yoshua Neuman
  • Kenneth D. Walsh
  • Kim LaScola Needy
  • Rufaidah AlMaian

Abstract

Results presented are part of a larger mixed-mode study on supplier quality practices focusing on the cross-analysis of interviews, focus groups, and a questionnaire, which collected actual data about timing, costs, practices, and non-conformances associated with purchase orders (POs) from Engineering Procure and Construct (EPC) projects for four material types considered relevant to projects built by EPC contractors based in the United States. The present discussion specifically focuses on the analysis of the non-parametric dataset obtained from the POs to investigate a subset of companies labelled as highly effective companies (HECs). This contribution is unique as it used a mixed-mode approach to collect data beyond construction sites and investigate the product/supplier side of construction processes to advance knowledge of how materials can be sent to construction project sites free of defects and rework and indicates practices that contribute to this goal. When compared to other companies in the dataset, HECs engage in more hours of observation in suppliers’ facilities, communicate more often with suppliers, put more effort and time in the planning stages of the project, use more practices related to supplier quality surveillance and supplier quality management, and find non-conformances earlier in the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Thaís da C. L. Alves & Yoshua Neuman & Kenneth D. Walsh & Kim LaScola Needy & Rufaidah AlMaian, 2020. "Highly effective companies in supplier quality surveillance practices: a quantitative analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 239-258, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:239-258
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2019.1590613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2019.1590613
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2019.1590613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:239-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.