IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v38y2020i10p917-933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of prevailing wages on building costs, bid competition, and bidder behaviour: evidence from Ohio school construction

Author

Listed:
  • Lameck Onsarigo
  • Kevin Duncan
  • Alan Atalah

Abstract

The Davis-Bacon Act and other state prevailing wage laws are instituted to, among other things, protect local compensation standards from possible degradations associated with public construction and create a level playing field for all competing contractors. The impact of prevailing wages on the cost of construction projects to the taxpayers is an issue that continues to be debated at the state and federal levels. In this paper, data from recent school construction projects in Ohio are used to examine the impact of federal prevailing wage standards on construction costs and bid competition. Results from the examination of all bids and winning bids indicate that prevailing wage requirements do not have a statistically significant effect on building costs or the level of bid competition. Results from endogenous treatment estimators provide additional evidence that the prevailing wage policy does not increase costs or limit competition. Additional analysis of all bids indicates that the cost-reducing effect of increased competition is stronger on projects covered by the prevailing wage policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lameck Onsarigo & Kevin Duncan & Alan Atalah, 2020. "The effect of prevailing wages on building costs, bid competition, and bidder behaviour: evidence from Ohio school construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 917-933, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:10:p:917-933
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2020.1723806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2020.1723806
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2020.1723806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:38:y:2020:i:10:p:917-933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.