IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v34y2016i4-5p286-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing value co-creation/destruction: a longitudinal education capital programme/project case study

Author

Listed:
  • Grant R.W. Mills
  • Kamran Razmdoost

Abstract

Drawing on a longitudinal empirical study of an education capital programme/project, value interactions are investigated at the interface between programme customers, project stakeholders and construction providers. Empirical evidence is provided that value formation is not only associated with value co-creation, but also with value co-destruction. The case study showed that a mature and synergistic network relationship (that successfully aligned the expectations of a strong key account management team (KAM team), multi-headed customer and wider project stakeholders) could, if not well managed, turn into incongruent relationships, relationship uncoupling and resource withdrawal. These findings suggest that project managers must drive strong KAM team relationships, so that they can align and adapt to customer requirements, and control the response to often changing wider stakeholder expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant R.W. Mills & Kamran Razmdoost, 2016. "Managing value co-creation/destruction: a longitudinal education capital programme/project case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4-5), pages 286-301, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:34:y:2016:i:4-5:p:286-301
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1187284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2016.1187284
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2016.1187284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:34:y:2016:i:4-5:p:286-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.