IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v32y2014i9p845-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employer investment in Apprenticeships in England: an exploration of the sensitivity of employers in the construction sector to the net costs of training

Author

Listed:
  • Terence Hogarth
  • Lynn Gambin

Abstract

Apprenticeships in England are undergoing major reform which will likely require employers to make a cash contribution to meeting the fees of their training providers. In return employers will be given more influence over the content of the training. If employers are expected to make a cash contribution this is likely to have an impact on their willingness to deliver Apprenticeships. Based on a series of employer case studies conducted between 1995 and 2011 an examination is provided of construction employers' sensitivity to the costs of delivering Apprenticeships. Because the cost to the employer is relatively high, and because there is a degree of uncertainty attached to recouping those costs, there is a distinct set of disincentives to construction employers providing Apprenticeships. This is important. First, the construction sector will need to recruit a large number of additional people into skilled trades jobs over the next 10 years as the sector's recovery gains pace and many existing employees retire. Second, Apprenticeships in the sector have an important role to play in young people's transition from school into work. A fall in the number of apprentices in the sector is likely to have important economic and social consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Terence Hogarth & Lynn Gambin, 2014. "Employer investment in Apprenticeships in England: an exploration of the sensitivity of employers in the construction sector to the net costs of training," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 845-856, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:9:p:845-856
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2014.923577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2014.923577
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2014.923577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:32:y:2014:i:9:p:845-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.