IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v31y2013i10p1025-1037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building networks to work: an ethnographic study of informal routes into the UK construction industry and pathways for migrant up-skilling

Author

Listed:
  • Dylan Tutt
  • Sarah Pink
  • Andy R.J. Dainty
  • Alistair Gibb

Abstract

The UK construction industry labour market is characterized by high levels of self-employment, subcontracting, informality and flexibility. A corollary of this, and a sign of the increasing globalization of construction, has been an increasing reliance on migrant labour, particularly that from the Eastern European Accession states. Yet, little is known about how migrant workers' experiences within and outside work shape their work in the construction sector. In this context better qualitative understandings of the social and communication networks through which migrant workers gain employment, create routes through the sector and develop their role/career are needed. We draw on two examples from a short-term ethnographic study of migrant construction worker employment experiences and practices in the town of Crewe in Cheshire, UK, to demonstrate how informal networks intersect with formal elements of the sector to facilitate both recruitment and up-skilling. Such research knowledge, we argue, offers new evidence of the importance of attending to migrant workers' own experiences in the development of more transparent recruitment processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dylan Tutt & Sarah Pink & Andy R.J. Dainty & Alistair Gibb, 2013. "Building networks to work: an ethnographic study of informal routes into the UK construction industry and pathways for migrant up-skilling," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(10), pages 1025-1037, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:31:y:2013:i:10:p:1025-1037
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.834066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2013.834066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2013.834066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:31:y:2013:i:10:p:1025-1037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.