IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v30y2012i5p339-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User perceptions of ICT impacts in Swedish construction companies: ‘it’s fine, just as it is’

Author

Listed:
  • Mattias Jacobsson
  • Henrik C.J. Linderoth

Abstract

The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in construction companies has been growing steadily during the last decade. However, few studies inquire into either perceptions of the impact of actual ICT use or perceptions among different occupational groups in construction companies. The aim of the paper is to explore users’ general perceptions of ICT impacts in the post-adoption stage and analyse the implications for construction management practice. A mixed methods approach was used. Quantitative data were collected using a web-based survey both in a major construction company and among medium-sized companies in Sweden. Data from 294 returned completed questionnaires were analysed with t-tests and multiple regression analysis. In addition, participant observations and semi-structured interviews were conducted within the major construction company in order to strengthen the analysis. It can be concluded that respondents are generally fairly satisfied with the ICT. Differences in perceptions among occupational groups can be explained by the nature of work tasks and the original intentions for using ICT as a means of control and calculation. Even if respondents perceive that a further development of ICT could improve competitiveness, they do not want to increase their use of it in their workplaces. They basically think that ‘it is fine, just as it is’. This indicates that a challenge in construction management is to investigate how prevailing and new ICT applications can be used to develop the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattias Jacobsson & Henrik C.J. Linderoth, 2012. "User perceptions of ICT impacts in Swedish construction companies: ‘it’s fine, just as it is’," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 339-357, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:30:y:2012:i:5:p:339-357
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2012.672757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01446193.2012.672757
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2012.672757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susanna Vass & Tina Karrbom Gustavsson, 2017. "Challenges when implementing BIM for industry change," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 597-610, October.
    2. Kristijan Robert Prebanić & Mladen Vukomanović, 2021. "Realizing the Need for Digital Transformation of Stakeholder Management: A Systematic Review in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Arno J. Van der Vlist & Marien H. Vrolijk & Geert P.M.R. Dewulf, 2014. "On information and communication technology and production cost in construction industry: evidence from the Netherlands," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 641-651, June.
    4. Peter Demian & David Walters, 2014. "The advantages of information management through building information modelling," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(12), pages 1153-1165, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:30:y:2012:i:5:p:339-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.