IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v25y2007i12p1219-1237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study

Author

Listed:
  • John Yeung
  • Albert Chan
  • Daniel Chan
  • Leong Kwan Li

Abstract

Over the past decade, research studies on benefits, critical success factors, difficulties, process, conceptual and theoretical models of construction partnering have been ubiquitous in the construction management discipline. In fact, there is adequate evidence that an increasing number of client organizations are adopting a partnering approach to undertake their building and construction projects both locally and worldwide during the last decade. With the perceived benefits that partnering brings about, research into Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the success of partnering projects in construction becomes vital as it can help set a benchmark for measuring the performance level of partnering projects. However, although there are some related studies and papers on this research area, few, if any, comprehensive and systematic studies focus on developing a comprehensive, objective, reliable and practical performance evaluation model for partnering projects. A model has been developed using the Delphi survey technique to objectively measure the performance of partnering projects in Hong Kong based on a consolidated KPIs' conceptual framework previously developed for partnering projects. Four rounds of Delphi questionnaire survey were conducted with 31 construction experts in Hong Kong. The results reveal that the top seven weighted KPIs to evaluate the success of partnering projects in Hong Kong were: (1) time performance; (2) cost performance; (3) top management commitment; (4) trust and respect; (5) quality performance; (6) effective communications; and (7) innovation and improvement. A statistically significant consensus on the top seven weighted KPIs was also obtained. Finally, a composite Partnering Performance Index (PPI) for partnering projects in Hong Kong was derived to provide an all-round assessment of partnering performance. Different partnering projects can now be assessed on the same basis for benchmarking purposes. Construction senior executives and project managers can thus use the Index to measure, evaluate and improve the performance of their partnering projects to strive for construction excellence. Although the PPI was developed locally in Hong Kong, the research method could be replicated in other parts of the world to produce similar indices for international comparison. Such an extension would aid the understanding of managing partnering projects across different geographic locations.

Suggested Citation

  • John Yeung & Albert Chan & Daniel Chan & Leong Kwan Li, 2007. "Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 1219-1237.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:12:p:1219-1237
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190701598673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190701598673
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190701598673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Che khairil Izam Che Ibrahim & Seosamh B. Costello & Suzanne Wilkinson, 2013. "Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(11), pages 1128-1143, November.
    2. Azevedo, Susana G. & Govindan, Kannan & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz-Machado, V., 2011. "GResilient index to assess the greenness and resilience of the automotive supply chain," Discussion Papers on Economics 8/2011, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    3. Sameh Al-Shihabi & Ridvan Aydin & Zehra Canan Araci & Fikri Dweiri & Mohammed Obeidat & Mohammad Fayez Al Bataineh, 2024. "Abolishing Single-Use Plastic Water Bottles in Dubai Hotels as a Voluntary Act—Scenarios and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Azevedo, Susana G. & Govindan, Kannan & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz-Machado, V., 2012. "An integrated model to assess the leanness and agility of the automotive industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 85-94.
    5. Olusola Olugbemileke Johnson & Abayomi Joseph Odekoya & Obinna Lawrence Umeh, 2012. "Factors Influencing the Usage of Compact Fluorescent Lamps in Existing Residential Buildings in Lagos, Nigeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 2(2), pages 63-70.
    6. Lin Li & Fangfang Fan & Li Ma & Ziran Tang, 2016. "Energy Utilization Evaluation of Carbon Performance in Public Projects by FAHP and Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Florence Yean Yng Ling & Phuong Quynh Tran, 2012. "Effects of interpersonal relations on public sector construction contracts in Vietnam," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(12), pages 1087-1101, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:25:y:2007:i:12:p:1219-1237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.