IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v23y2005i3p317-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Main contractor experiences of partnering relationships on UK construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard Wood
  • Robert Ellis

Abstract

Partnering provides a major opportunity for improving project performance, whilst offering direct benefits to the whole of the supply chain. Many research studies reinforce this assertion although there is less critical analysis examining the nature of partnering in practice and whether the claims made for it are consistently justified. The experiences of commercial surveyors and managers within the UK construction industry have been gathered in a pilot study, drawing on the opinions of 48 commercial managers employed by a leading national contractor. The perceptions and experiences of partnering relationships are generally positive, although the early optimism at the beginning of such arrangements is seldom sustained throughout the project lifecycle. Attitudes to partnering are similar whether the relationship is upstream (client/main contractor) or downstream (main contractor/subcontractor). The growth in popularity of alternative procurement methods and statutory adjudication are both regarded as having placed contracting parties on a more equal footing. However in today's competitive environment, contractors continue to operate on tight margins and, common to all project stakeholders, the financial imperative remains the commercial manager's principal consideration. Trust is hard-earned and relationships are still characterised by a cost driven agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard Wood & Robert Ellis, 2005. "Main contractor experiences of partnering relationships on UK construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 317-325.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:3:p:317-325
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000287714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144619042000287714
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619042000287714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hemanta Doloi, 2009. "Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1099-1109.
    2. Florence Phua, 2006. "When is construction partnering likely to happen? An empirical examination of the role of institutional norms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 615-624.
    3. Benjamin S. Stroebele & Andreas J. Kiessling, 2017. "Impact Analysis of Complexity Drivers in the Supply Chain of Prefabricated Houses," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:3:p:317-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.