Author
Abstract
It is generally recognized that there is a lack of equality of opportunity for minority-led contractors and consultants (i.e. where at least 50 per cent of the workforce or ownership is from a minority group, such as women, disabled people or a black and minority ethnic community) to compete for work within the housing association sector. In response, the Housing Corporation, the government quango responsible for social housing in the UK, recently commissioned research to investigate the potential benefits of establishing a national database of such companies for the sector in England. The expectation was that such an initiative will help develop, support and promote black and minority ethnic (BME) companies and at the same time, redress the skills shortage in the construction industry. Recent funding cuts within the Housing Corporation now seriously undermine the future sustainability and development of this sector of the construction industry. This paper begins by providing an overview of the types of discrimination faced by BME contractors and consultants. This is set within the context of an unprecedented expansion in the construction sector but where restricted capacity among mainstream contractors due to skill and staff shortages is increasingly evident. The extent to which contractor registration databases have addressed these inequalities is then considered with particular reference to the largest of such contractor registration systems, Constructionline. Drawing on recent empirical work, the development requirements of such a database from the perspective of BME contractors and consultants is considered. The discussion also focuses on the future sustainability of BME small and medium enterprises. The commitment of social housing agencies to equality of opportunity will be crucial to the success of this sector.
Suggested Citation
Andy Steele & Stephen Todd, 2005.
"The future of the black and minority ethnic (BME) construction sector in England,"
Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 1017-1023.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:10:p:1017-1023
DOI: 10.1080/01446190500372429
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:10:p:1017-1023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.