IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v22y2004i10p1047-1056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project management decisions with multiple fuzzy goals

Author

Listed:
  • Reay-Chen Wang
  • Tien-Fu Liang

Abstract

In real-world situations, the project managers must handle conflicting goals that govern the use of the resources within organizations. These conflicting goals must are required to be optimized simultaneously by the project managers in the framework of fuzzy aspiration levels. The multiple fuzzy goals programming model proposed herein helps project managers to minimize project total costs, total completion time, and total crashing costs considering direct costs, indirect costs, contractual penalty costs, duration of activities and total budget constraint. A numerical example illustrates the feasibility of applying the proposed model to a project management decision problem. Consequently, the proposed model yields an efficient compromise solution and the decision maker's overall degree of satisfaction with determined multiple fuzzy goals values. Moreover, the proposed model effectively provides a systematic decision-making framework, enabling a decision maker to interactively modify the fuzzy data and model parameters until a satisfactory solution is obtained. The significant characteristics that differentiate the proposed model from the other models include flexible decision-making processes, multiple objective functions, and wide-ranging decision information.

Suggested Citation

  • Reay-Chen Wang & Tien-Fu Liang, 2004. "Project management decisions with multiple fuzzy goals," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(10), pages 1047-1056, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:10:p:1047-1056
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000241453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144619042000241453
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619042000241453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:10:p:1047-1056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.