IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v16y1998i1p109-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of theory in construction management: reply to Runeson

Author

Listed:
  • David Seymour
  • Darryll Crook
  • John Rooke

Abstract

In his comment on Seymour, D.E., Crook, D.J. and Rooke, J.A. (1997). Construction Management and Economics, 15, 117-19 (Construction Management and Economics, 15, 299-302) argues that positivism provides the best insurance against bad research in construction management studies. He claims that positivist methods of theory building have been modified sufficiently to cope with the demands of management research. He accuses Seymour et al. of being anti-scientific in questioning the viability of these methods. In this short reply, we refute these assertions, pointing out some remaining obstacles to the application of positivist methods to management research.

Suggested Citation

  • David Seymour & Darryll Crook & John Rooke, 1998. "The role of theory in construction management: reply to Runeson," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 109-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:1:p:109-112
    DOI: 10.1080/014461998372655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014461998372655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/014461998372655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goran Runeson, 1997. "The role of theory in construction management research: comment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 299-302.
    2. David Seymour & Darryll Crook & John Rooke, 1997. "The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 117-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Brochner & Per-erik Josephson & Johan Alte, 2005. "Identifying management research priorities," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 793-796.
    2. Chris Harriss, 1998. "Why research without theory is not research A reply to Seymour, Crook and Rooke," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 113-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:1:p:109-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.