IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v15y1997i4p383-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rigour in research and peer review

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Fenn

Abstract

This note discusses rigour in research and in the peer review of academic journals by examining current research into construction conflict and disputes. Comments are made on a paper by Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M. and Harris, F.C. (1996) Construction Management and Economics, 14, 375-394. The paucity of research in this field is discussed and the current literature is reviewed. The note concludes that: more work is required in this area; the lack of data is no excuse for subjective theorizing; basic rules of research must be complied with for research to retain its integrity; and the value of peer reviewed journals is reduced by the publication of papers which ignore these points.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Fenn, 1997. "Rigour in research and peer review," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 383-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:383-385
    DOI: 10.1080/014461997372944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014461997372944
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/014461997372944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabah Alkass & Mark Mazerolle & Frank Harris, 1998. "Rigour in research and peer-review: a reply," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 139-140.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:4:p:383-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.