IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v51y2020i5p593-608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social cohesion, internal efficacy, and external efficacy: Studying voting behavior using collective efficacy theory

Author

Listed:
  • Michael C. Gearhart

Abstract

Collective efficacy theory is a widely used theoretical framework for explaining how social cohesion is activated as collective actions. Because collective efficacy was developed as a criminological theory, the majority of collective efficacy research focuses on the relationship between social cohesion and informal social control. Conceptually, social cohesion can be activated as civic participation – particularly voting. Although research examining voting behavior through a collective efficacy framework is scarce, findings suggest that collective efficacy is a useful framework for explaining civic participation. However, previous research is limited because it lacks key predictors of voting – namely internal efficacy and external efficacy. This study examines the relationships among social cohesion, internal efficacy, and external efficacy using a nationally representative sample of voters. Findings support collective efficacy as a useful framework for increasing civic participation. Further, social cohesion, internal efficacy, and external efficacy are key factors predicting civic participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael C. Gearhart, 2020. "Social cohesion, internal efficacy, and external efficacy: Studying voting behavior using collective efficacy theory," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(5), pages 593-608, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:51:y:2020:i:5:p:593-608
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2020.1825502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2020.1825502
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2020.1825502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:51:y:2020:i:5:p:593-608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.