IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v50y2019i4p389-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small towns and urban centers: The relationship of distance and population size to community satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew L. McKnight
  • Benjamin G. Gibbs
  • Scott R. Sanders
  • Michael R. Cope
  • Jorden E. Jackson
  • Paige N. Park

Abstract

In past research, the relationship between population size and community satisfaction have reported mixed results. Additionally, few community studies utilized distance from urban centers as a complementary to population size. Using the 2010 Montana Health Matters Study, this research seeks to uncover how these two measures together help to explain community satisfaction. Our results indicate that distance and population size are conflated measures when used separately. Yet, when used together, both measures complement each other in capturing place-based elements of community satisfaction. Paradoxically, findings show that residents are less satisfied the farther they live from urban centers when accounting for population size, yet residents are more satisfied with their community when they live in very small populated communities after accounting for distance. These findings suggest that residents living in small-populated communities adjacent to urban centres are the most satisfied with their communities than larger rural communities farther from urban centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew L. McKnight & Benjamin G. Gibbs & Scott R. Sanders & Michael R. Cope & Jorden E. Jackson & Paige N. Park, 2019. "Small towns and urban centers: The relationship of distance and population size to community satisfaction," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 389-405, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:389-405
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2019.1682020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2019.1682020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2019.1682020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paige N. Park & Scott R. Sanders & Michael R. Cope & Kayci A. Muirbrook & Carol Ward, 2021. "New Perspectives on the Community Impact of Rural Education Deserts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:389-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.