IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v47y2016i5p683-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of research in community arts: Developing an evaluation framework in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Im Sik Cho
  • Quyen Duong
  • Ivan Nasution

Abstract

Community arts in Singapore have gradually evolved since the country became a self-governing state in 1959, from a mostly top–down approach of government-initiated programs to include more ground-up initiatives. This shift advocated embracing community members not only as audience but also as originators, through community-focused policies and programs aimed at making arts and culture more accessible. In this changing context, this article seeks to understand the relationship between cultural research and practice, and examines a collaborative project between the National Arts Council of Singapore and the National University of Singapore that aims to create a community-based evaluation framework to assess and evaluate arts and culture-focused community spaces in Singapore. Results from the study show that research can inform change that not only facilitates collaboration among different stakeholders in the process of creating the outcome, but also promotes further ground-up engagement in community arts by empowering practitioners with an evaluation framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Im Sik Cho & Quyen Duong & Ivan Nasution, 2016. "Role of research in community arts: Developing an evaluation framework in Singapore," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 683-699, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:683-699
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2016.1227345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2016.1227345
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2016.1227345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:47:y:2016:i:5:p:683-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.