IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v43y2018i2p248-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What environmental art can teach us about wind farms: exploring the boundaries of cultural aesthetics in Scottish landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Kristen Layne

Abstract

Installations in the Scottish landscape garner a range of public reactions, from being much-loved to much-maligned. Two categories of landscape installation illustrating this range of reactions are landscape art installations and wind farms, both of which at times have been both widely positively received and largely criticised and protested. Viewing installations such as these through the consideration of the cultural landscape, incorporating social, economic and political history into the natural landscape, offers new ways of understanding their impact on viewers. Using Casey’s boundary/border discourse and Berleant’s aesthetic engagement theory, this article considers the impact of wind farms and large-scale landscape art installations on the landscape, and critically considers Scottish Natural Heritage wind farm siting guidance in light of the theoretical frames presented. The article concludes that current policy and practices surrounding wind farms render them exclusionary and homogenous, and that openness and distinctiveness are essential for improving public perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Kristen Layne, 2018. "What environmental art can teach us about wind farms: exploring the boundaries of cultural aesthetics in Scottish landscapes," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 248-259, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:43:y:2018:i:2:p:248-259
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1318118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2017.1318118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2017.1318118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Cheng & Jiayin Chen & Jiahua Li & Lin Li & Guanhua Hou & Xuan Xiao, 2023. "Research on the Preference of Public Art Design in Urban Landscapes: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:43:y:2018:i:2:p:248-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.