IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjutxx/v31y2024i3p53-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for Urban Livability: Integrating Socio-Spatial Indicators in City-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjam Schindler
  • Rita Dionisio

Abstract

Visions of livable neighborhoods are receiving increasing priority on contemporary city-making agendas. Yet, while city-makers have long turned to various tools supporting economic and environmental visions, there is a limited integration of indicators to enhance socio-spatial outcomes, such as urban livability (UL). UL has underlying spatial and cultural components, adding significant complexity to city-making practices. This is often not adequately taken into account in current decision-support tools, nor in planning processes. This research examines gaps to enable indicator-led city-making for integrated socio-spatial outcomes with multiple partners and collaborators. This study exposes key challenges for the integration of socio-spatial indicators in city-making processes, with an international literature review and a survey among city-makers in Aotearoa New Zealand. It highlights critical barriers such as the need for culturally appropriate data and indicators, engagement, and improved feedback between collaborating stakeholders. While offering some practical recommendations for city-making research and practice, our findings suggest that systemic changes are necessary to dismantle existing power dominances and to influence current city-making paradigms to reflect critical ontological shifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjam Schindler & Rita Dionisio, 2024. "Planning for Urban Livability: Integrating Socio-Spatial Indicators in City-Making," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 53-82, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:53-82
    DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2024.2391889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10630732.2024.2391889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10630732.2024.2391889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:53-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.