IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjutxx/v25y2018i4p39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Attributes Influencing the Success of Urban 3D Visualizations: Differences in Assessments According to Training and Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Maria del Carmen Llinares Millán
  • Susana Iñarra
  • Jaime Guixeres

Abstract

The graphic tools most widely used for communicating the design of future urban spaces are 3D visualizations. These virtual images allow graphic designers to manipulate conditions to embellish the final image they present. But, what design attributes are associated with positive assessments? This paper attempts to identify the key design attributes for a successful proposal and observes whether intention (assess the image versus assess the project) and observer training (architect versus non-architect) influence that relationship. A field study was carried out using assessments from 225 individuals. Results show that color, nature, and architecture are fundamental elements in successful proposals. Significant differences in assessments have also been observed according to the training and intentions of the assessors.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria del Carmen Llinares Millán & Susana Iñarra & Jaime Guixeres, 2018. "Design Attributes Influencing the Success of Urban 3D Visualizations: Differences in Assessments According to Training and Intention," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 39-57, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:39-57
    DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1444873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10630732.2018.1444873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10630732.2018.1444873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.