IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjutxx/v23y2016i3p3-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Place Matter? The Effects of Concentrated Poverty on the Computer Use of Elementary Students

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary R. Simoni
  • Philip Gibson
  • Shelia R Cotten
  • Kristi Stringer
  • LaToya O. Coleman

Abstract

For several decades, scholars have investigated technological inequality within American society. These studies have focused on individual-level predictors of computer use such as income, education, and technological skills. Although these individual-level inequities are important contributors of technological inequalities, they neglect the importance of place, including neighborhood-level factors such as median income, racial composition, and educational attainment. The purpose of this study is to address this gap in the current literature by examining neighborhood-level effects of concentrated poverty on the trajectory of computer use (the change in computer use over a one-year period). Data were collected from fourth and fifth grade classrooms from two data points in a public school district in a mid-sized city in the southeastern United States. Results indicate that measures of concentrated poverty have an influence on the trajectory of computer use among elementary students. These findings suggest that social inequalities at the neighborhood level need to be addressed to further eliminate the digital divide in computer use among elementary students.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary R. Simoni & Philip Gibson & Shelia R Cotten & Kristi Stringer & LaToya O. Coleman, 2016. "Does Place Matter? The Effects of Concentrated Poverty on the Computer Use of Elementary Students," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 3-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:3-21
    DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1073901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10630732.2015.1073901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10630732.2015.1073901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.