IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjutxx/v23y2016i2p3-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Use of Analytical Information in Transport Planning in China: How Is It Different from Western Democracies?

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Mu
  • Niek Mouter
  • Martin de Jong

Abstract

Theory on the strategic use of knowledge in planning large infrastructure projects is comparatively well-developed in the fields of public policy and urban/transport planning for Western democracies. But how policymakers make use of knowledge and what position policy analysts hold in non-Western countries still remains largely unknown territory in the literature. This article begins to explore this topic by studying two urban transport projects in the Chinese city of Dalian. Based on empirical evidence, the article concludes with a number of preliminary but notable differences between Western countries and China in terms of the administrative mechanisms underlying the strategic use of knowledge in policymaking. We found that Chinese institutional incentives with regard to cadre evaluation and promotion channels largely constitute the motivation of politicians to use knowledge strategically. Additionally, the wider social and administrative cultures in China, including a command-and-control tradition and a high level of power distance create a basis for the strategic use of information as well as the manipulation of analytical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Mu & Niek Mouter & Martin de Jong, 2016. "Strategic Use of Analytical Information in Transport Planning in China: How Is It Different from Western Democracies?," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 3-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:3-22
    DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1102424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102424
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin De Jong & Helen Stout & Li Sun, 2017. "Seeing the People’s Republic of China through the Eyes of Montesquieu: Why Sino-European Collaboration on Eco City Development Suffers from European Misinterpretations of “Good Governance”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Chun, Jungwoo & Moody, Joanna & Zhao, Jinhua, 2018. "Transportation Policymaking in Beijing and Shanghai: Contributors, Obstacles, and Process," SocArXiv kj32r, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjutxx:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:3-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjut20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.