IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v21y2016i4p439-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: contributions of space syntax and spatial cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Marcus
  • Matteo Giusti
  • Stephan Barthel

Abstract

Post-industrial societies impose new ecological challenges on urbanism. However, it is argued here that most approaches to sustainable urbanism still share the conception of the humans-environment relations that characterized modernism. The paper finds support in recent knowledge developments in social-ecological sustainability, spatial analysis and cognitive science to initiate a dialogue for an alternative framework. Urban form engages humans not only through physical activities, but also mentally through opportunities for learning and creation of meaning, thereby both reinforcing and impeding behaviours on a cognitive level. Against this background, it is proposed that what in cognition studies is termed ‘cognitive affordances’ could form the core of a new epistemological framework of the human-environment relation in sustainable urbanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Marcus & Matteo Giusti & Stephan Barthel, 2016. "Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: contributions of space syntax and spatial cognition," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 439-452, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:439-452
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charalambous, Efrosini, 2023. "Neurourbanism and Neuroarchitecture: How can Cognitive Sciences Inform Design?," OSF Preprints 6f4uc, Center for Open Science.
    2. Johan Colding & Karl Samuelsson & Lars Marcus & Åsa Gren & Ann Legeby & Meta Berghauser Pont & Stephan Barthel, 2022. "Frontiers in Social–Ecological Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Jan Maňas, 2023. "Identification of Local Accessibility Hubs and Leisure Amenities in Suburbanized Settlements: Case Study on the Suburban Zone of Prague," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    4. Kayvan Karimi, 2023. "The Configurational Structures of Social Spaces: Space Syntax and Urban Morphology in the Context of Analytical, Evidence-Based Design," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Kayvan Karimi, 2018. "Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-4, January.
    6. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Sewoong Hwang & Zoonky Lee & Jonghyuk Kim, 2019. "Real-Time Pedestrian Flow Analysis Using Networked Sensors for a Smart Subway System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Chun-Chen Chou & Kento Yoh & Shotaro Hirokawa & Kenji Doi, 2023. "Co-evolution of Smart Small Vehicles and Human Spatial Experiences: Case Study on Battery-Sharing Electric Two-Wheelers Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Lars Marcus & Daniel Koch, 2017. "Cities as implements or facilities – The need for a spatial morphology in smart city systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(2), pages 204-226, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:439-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.