IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v18y2013i2p263-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conserving Dirty Concrete: The Decline and Rise of Pasmore's Apollo Pavilion, Peterlee

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Farmer
  • John Pendlebury

Abstract

The Apollo Pavilion, Peterlee, is a large sculpture built to the designs of artist Victor Pasmore. Always controversial, the pavilion has been under threat for much of its life. However, it is recently restored and in December 2011 it was granted Grade II* listing. This might be seen as a story of an artwork and monument rescued from ruin by an artistic and cultural elite similar to the one which created it, as part of a wider "authorized heritage discourse" that has sought to revalorize avant-garde modernist structures despite public hostility. However, the paper argues that the pavilion also needs to be understood in other ways. First, the impetus for creating a positive future for the pavilion has been generated locally. Second, there is a need to understand it in the wider context of the landscape in which it sits; as the visual culmination of an ambitious collaboration between artist and architect. Third, the pavilion should be seen as a monument embodying progressive values, as part of the post-war settlement that strove to create better living environments for all. Fourth, it is argued, it is an object that will continue to provoke, rather than becoming part of a warm, comforting blanket of heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Farmer & John Pendlebury, 2013. "Conserving Dirty Concrete: The Decline and Rise of Pasmore's Apollo Pavilion, Peterlee," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 263-280, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:263-280
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2013.772884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2013.772884
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2013.772884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Adams & Peter Larkham, 2016. "Walking with the ghosts of the past: Unearthing the value of residents’ urban nostalgias," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2004-2022, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:263-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.