IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v16y2011i1p105-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Living Green’: The Promise and Pitfalls of New Sustainable Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Mapes
  • Jennifer Wolch

Abstract

Until 2008, there was no comprehensive system to measure the sustainability of new community developments. Many new community projects, however, have won accolades for their design. This study examines 29 of these projects, in light of efforts to create indicators to measure sustainability dimensions of new developments. The study finds that the marketing websites of award-winning projects tend to focus on features that increase community attractiveness to potential buyers, but do not incorporate a full range of attributes to enhance environmental and socio-economic sustainability. This suggests the importance of more systematic rating systems and highlights the complexities of designing, building and evaluating communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Mapes & Jennifer Wolch, 2011. "‘Living Green’: The Promise and Pitfalls of New Sustainable Communities," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 105-126.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:16:y:2011:i:1:p:105-126
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2011.521012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2011.521012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2011.521012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harsimran Kaur & Pushplata Garg, 2022. "Case-based assessment of planned hill town using existing urban sustainability assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4413-4433, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:16:y:2011:i:1:p:105-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.