Author
Abstract
This article examines imperial politics surrounding rinderpest epidemics along the south-western Tanganyikan border, made urgent by the appearance of the virus in migrating wildlife in 1939. Between 1938 and 1945, the British Colonial Office and governments of eastern and southern Africa undertook vaccination campaigns along the Tanganyika–Nyasaland–Northern Rhodesian border with the goal of protecting the cattle of southern Africa. Since the First World War the Tanganyikan veterinary department had the principal task of ensuring that rinderpest did not reach southern Africa, where settler-dominated herds were susceptible because they had been free of the virus since the turn of the century. While vaccine breakthroughs promised to eradicate rinderpest in cattle, the appearance of the virus in wildlife near the south-western border undermined rinderpest eradication efforts at a time when the world war demanded large quantities of beef for Allied forces and to feed African workers. The inter-territorial veterinary departments therefore constructed a wildlife fence between Lakes Nyasa and Tanganyika and undertook game slaughter to stop the virus. Using the concept of fence ecology, which examines the politics of fence construction and its effects on human–nature relationships, this article explores southern African interventions in the Tanganyikan rinderpest campaigns during and after the war, when the Colonial Office worried about its inability to eradicate the virus within its own colonies. The failure of the Nyasa–Tanganyika fence had implications for post-war rinderpest campaigns, which shifted focus to the Serengeti plains of northern Tanganyika, conflicting with the development of national parks.
Suggested Citation
Thaddeus Sunseri, 2024.
"The Game Factor: Tanganyikan Rinderpest Campaigns, Fence Ecology and the Wildlife Threat to Southern Africa, 1938–1956,"
Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 263-284, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:263-284
DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2024.2417635
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:263-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.