Author
Listed:
- Alexander Caramento
- Marja Hinfelaar
- Caesar Cheelo
Abstract
Heightened copper prices and the perceived profiteering of foreign mining investors in the 2000s spurred calls for greater revenue from mineral extraction in Zambia. Following the abrogation of the over-concessionary development agreements (DAs) in 2008 and the concomitant formation of the Mining Taxation Unit in the Large Taxpayer Office, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) has essentially functioned as an instrument of those resource nationalist demands. Building on the professionalisation of the regulatory body under the Mwanawasa administration, the ZRA became a formidable force in the policing of Zambia’s mining fiscal regime. In comparison to the rest of the country’s bureaucracy then, the ZRA functioned as what some scholars have termed a ‘pocket of effectiveness’ (POE). From 2006 until 2014, under the aegis of a ‘technocratic coalition’ made up of officials at the ZRA and Ministry of Finance, sympathetic politicians, and foreign technical advisers, the revenue authority was able to bolster its capacity to administer mining taxation. It is essential that the ZRA is not merely examined as an administrative institution outside of the political realm. This article’s contribution is that it examines the political factors that shape the ZRA’s emergence, performance and sustainability over time in relation to mining taxation. It demonstrates how the nature of Zambia’s political settlement, the structural power of the foreign mining investors and the weaknesses of other government ministries have encumbered the effectiveness of the ZRA as an instrument of resource nationalism. The article is based on interviews with a wide range of actors, quantitative and qualitative data and unreleased sources.
Suggested Citation
Alexander Caramento & Marja Hinfelaar & Caesar Cheelo, 2023.
"Asymmetries of Power and Capacity: The Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) as an Instrument of Resource Nationalism, 1994–2021,"
Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 415-438, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:49:y:2023:i:3:p:415-438
DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2023.2270645
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:49:y:2023:i:3:p:415-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.