IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v46y2020i4p703-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Botswana Votes 2019: Two-Party Competition and the Khama Factor

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Brown

Abstract

The October 2019 Botswana national election, which returned the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) to power for the twelfth consecutive time, was dominated by a man whose name was not even on the ballot: former President Ian Khama. In an unprecedented move, Khama had broken with the BDP, a party he had led as president for 10 years, to form a new political party and to campaign against his successor, President Mokgweetsi Masisi. A highly controversial figure, Khama was none the less embraced by the main opposition coalition, the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC). Although the ‘Khama factor’ helped the UDC in some parts of the country, the decision to work with Khama proved overall to be a major strategic blunder by the opposition, which suffered a decline in its vote share and its representation in parliament. Paradoxically, despite the continued electoral dominance of the BDP, the election reinforces a long-standing trend toward the emergence of a competitive two-party system in Botswana.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Brown, 2020. "Botswana Votes 2019: Two-Party Competition and the Khama Factor," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 703-722, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:46:y:2020:i:4:p:703-722
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2020.1778901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2020.1778901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2020.1778901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:46:y:2020:i:4:p:703-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.