IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v44y2018i1p97-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Good People Become Absurd: J.P. van S. Bruwer, the Making of Namibian Grand Apartheid and the Decline of Volkekunde

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Gordon

Abstract

Perhaps the most co-ordinated and dramatic single attempt to impose ‘Grand Apartheid’ in southern Africa was the implementation of the Odendaal Commission recommendations in South West Africa. In this exercise, the role of the social anthropologist J.P. van S. Bruwer was crucial. His expertise was deployed not only in formulating the framework of the recommendations but also in its initial implementation. It was also used to try to convince an increasingly sceptical international audience, most notably at the International Court of Justice, that apartheid was morally just and workable. Bruwer’s assumptions and arguments were demonstrably absurd. This raises a conundrum: how could an obviously intelligent scholar and morally upright person be so mistaken? Using Collins’ theory of ‘Interaction Ritual Chains’, this article suggests that organisations like the Afrikaner Broederbond (AB) and SABRA served to shackle Bruwer’s imagination to such a degree that he could not see how fallacious his arguments were.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Gordon, 2018. "How Good People Become Absurd: J.P. van S. Bruwer, the Making of Namibian Grand Apartheid and the Decline of Volkekunde," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 97-113, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:97-113
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2018.1403266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2018.1403266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2018.1403266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:97-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.