IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v43y2017i5p1069-1085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Post-War Foreign Direct Investment in Angola: South–South Led or the West Still Rules?

Author

Listed:
  • Fernandes Wanda

Abstract

Members of the political elite of Angola often explain the post-war economic recovery through south–south co-operation, with particular reference to the emerging economies – that is, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). Mainstream argument suggests that although foreign direct investment (FDI) from new sources, such as the BRICS, is necessary for natural resource-rich developing countries, the effects of this investment are likely to replicate western practices, making it difficult for these countries to move away from natural-resource dependency. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa are particular likely to experience these challenges. However, by looking at the historical relations between Angola and the BRICS, then examining the patterns of the FDI registered with the Angolan National Private Investment Agency (ANIP) (from 2003 until 2013), this study indicates that BRICS FDI has been concentrated in the non-mineral sector, particularly in construction and manufacturing. Evidence further highlights the point that despite inadequate transparency and poor accountability, western-based FDI still rules in Angola.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandes Wanda, 2017. "Understanding Post-War Foreign Direct Investment in Angola: South–South Led or the West Still Rules?," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:43:y:2017:i:5:p:1069-1085
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2017.1343414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2017.1343414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2017.1343414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:43:y:2017:i:5:p:1069-1085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.