IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v42y2016i2p183-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biko, Hegel and the End of Black Consciousness: A Historico-Philosophical Discourse on South African Racism

Author

Listed:
  • M. John Lamola

Abstract

Black Consciousness, as seminally constructed by Steve Biko as a political philosophy of struggle against apartheid racism, has been subjected to a wide range of explications, which, in the main, have been from a perspective shaped by political activism. Here, in a deliberately philosophical project, we demonstrate how the rational structure of Black Consciousness is shaped by Biko’s employment of the Hegelian dialectical form as an analytical tool. We highlight the critical conceptual value of ‘black solidarity’, which Biko posits as the antithetical moment, in line with the Hegelian triad. This doctrine of the self-exclusion and grouping of black people against inter-racial alliances has hitherto been submerged under the emphasis on Biko’s evocative utterances on the liberation of the black mind from slave mentality. We point out how this analytical framework, which adopts black solidarity as the antithesis to white racism, eventuates in a logical contradiction of Biko’s vision that Black Consciousness would lead to a universal non-racial consciousness, ‘true humanity’. Our claim is that this logical defect, in corroboration of Hegelian rationality, translates into a defective and ineffective political praxis.

Suggested Citation

  • M. John Lamola, 2016. "Biko, Hegel and the End of Black Consciousness: A Historico-Philosophical Discourse on South African Racism," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 183-194, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:42:y:2016:i:2:p:183-194
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1135672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2016.1135672
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2016.1135672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:42:y:2016:i:2:p:183-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.