IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v41y2015i4p753-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jackal Narratives: Predator Control and Contested Ecologies in the Karoo, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoli Nattrass
  • Beatrice Conradie

Abstract

This article considers the historical roots of, and scientific evidence for, rival ‘jackal narratives’ about the ecology and control of the black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas) in the Karoo, South Africa. During the mid 20th century, state-supported co-operative hunting and jackal-proof fences largely contained jackal predation. But as South Africa moved towards democracy in the 1990s, in a context of falling on-farm employment and the ending of subsidised fences and state-supported predator control, jackal predation re-emerged as a problem for economically and politically marginalised commercial sheep farmers in the Karoo. When CapeNature (the government body responsible for maintaining biodiversity on agricultural lands in the Western Cape province) sought to restrict the trapping and shooting of predators by farmers, an emotive battle with political ramifications erupted over the science of predator ecology. A rival ‘citizen science’ from farmers and hunters emerged to challenge the dominant ‘environmental jackal narrative’, which blamed hunting for the increase in jackals. We argue that the environmental jackal narrative was supported by the science of predator ecology (showing that predator numbers can increase as a result of persecution), but that the linked policy recommendation that farmers learn to ‘live with the jackal’ occupied less solid scientific and historical grounds. The rival ‘farmer jackal narrative’, which sought to justify the lethal control of jackals, resonated not only with farmers’ historical experience but also with some emerging conservation theories and practices regarding the culling of jackals in national parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoli Nattrass & Beatrice Conradie, 2015. "Jackal Narratives: Predator Control and Contested Ecologies in the Karoo, South Africa," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 753-771, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:41:y:2015:i:4:p:753-771
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2015.1049484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2015.1049484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2015.1049484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Conradie, Beatrice & Genis, Amelia & Greyling, Jan & Piesse, Jenifer, 2021. "District-level agricultural total factor productivity for the Karoo, South Africa: 1952–2002," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 60(2), April.
    2. Wustro, Ivo & Conradie, Beatrice, 2019. "How stable are farmers’ risk perceptions? A follow-up study of one community in the Karoo," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(1), September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:41:y:2015:i:4:p:753-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.