IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v41y2015i3p485-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empire of Rivers: The Scheme to Flood the Kalahari, 1919–1945

Author

Listed:
  • Meredith McKittrick

Abstract

In 1919, a geology professor named Ernest Schwarz argued that the diversion of the Chobe and Kunene Rivers into the Kalahari was necessary to avoid catastrophic desertification, which threatened to force South African whites from the land. Despite being deemed impractical by government scientists, his proposed ‘Kalahari Redemption Scheme’ was supported by a broad spectrum of white farmers, academics, parliamentarians, and even industrialists into the 1940s. The professor's contentions about meteorology, climate change, and geological history were subject to heated debate. But what was never at issue was the notion that white South Africans had the right to divert rivers and flood land that they did not formally possess, for the benefit of white South Africa itself. The discussions around Schwarz's scheme challenge the conventional notion that there was little popular support within South Africa for South African expansion. This paper explores the origins of popular support for ‘Greater South Africa’, contrasting the hopes and fears of white farmers with the better-known territorial ambitions of Smuts and other statesmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Meredith McKittrick, 2015. "An Empire of Rivers: The Scheme to Flood the Kalahari, 1919–1945," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 485-504, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:41:y:2015:i:3:p:485-504
    DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2015.1025339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057070.2015.1025339
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057070.2015.1025339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:41:y:2015:i:3:p:485-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.