IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v30y2004i2p359-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reframing Remembrance: the Politics of the Centenary Commemoration of the South African War of 1899–1902

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Grundlingh

Abstract

In scale and intensity, the war of 1899–1902 was the closest that South Africans came to total war during the twentieth century. The war left a legacy of bitter memories and mutual recriminations. It assumed a central place in Afrikaner historical consciousness, feeding into subsequent Afrikaner nationalism for the first half of the century. With developments in South Africa during the 1990s, which saw a white government making way for a predominantly black one, the cultural significance of what had publicly long been viewed as a whites-only affair became a more contested area than previously. Several competing groups tried to reshape the significance of the war along different lines. The state tried to graft its particular perceptions onto a body of congealed historical understanding; some Africanist groupings considered the centenary quite irrelevant to the ‘new’ South Africa; Afrikaners showed a lively interest in the centenary, but by and large steered away from overt political interpretations linking the war to renewed calls for ethnic mobilisation; and commercialised interests tried to package the war for the purposes of tourism. This article aims to disaggregate these permutations and explain the underlying impulses helping to shape the different forms of commemoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Grundlingh, 2004. "Reframing Remembrance: the Politics of the Centenary Commemoration of the South African War of 1899–1902," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 359-375.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:30:y:2004:i:2:p:359-375
    DOI: 10.1080/0305707042000215400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0305707042000215400
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0305707042000215400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:30:y:2004:i:2:p:359-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.