IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v29y2003i1p133-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Veterinary Research and the African Rinderpest Epizootic: The Cape Colony, 1896-1898

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Gilfoyle

Abstract

The rinderpest epizootic produced in the Cape Colony a crisis of knowledge about animal disease and its control. The Cape government drew on the knowledge and expertise of veterinary and medical scientists to devise means of dealing with the epizootic. This article examines veterinary policy and research into rinderpest at the Cape. Policy was initially based on the British model of quarantine and slaughter, but these methods proved politically controversial and prohibitively expensive. Researchers used the methods of an emerging immunological science, together with local knowledge, to develop techniques of prophylactic inoculation which were potentially effective in the field. This process was non-linear and characterised by both errors and professional rivalry, but enabled the government to abandon its politically confrontational policies of veterinary policing. Voluntary programmes of inoculation became the central component of government policy for dealing with the disease. The epizootic not only produced political tension, but also helped spread scientific ideas and techniques across parts of the colony. In this regard, state resources and official veterinary efforts to control rinderpest were directed primarily towards European farmers. Nevertheless, veterinary science did not become straightforwardly a 'tool' of the colonist; its acceptance and use were mediated by the perceptions and experiences of various groups. Officials and some farmers perceived that the extent to which prophylactic inoculation was practised had a substantial bearing on mortality rates. Overall, the Cape state at the end of the nineteenth century was able to deal relatively effectively, in the African context, with a serious outbreak of animal disease. The perceived success of veterinary services strengthened the position of the vets within the Cape's Department of Agriculture and led to more extensive experimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Gilfoyle, 2003. "Veterinary Research and the African Rinderpest Epizootic: The Cape Colony, 1896-1898," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 133-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:29:y:2003:i:1:p:133-154
    DOI: 10.1080/0305707032000060494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0305707032000060494
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0305707032000060494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:29:y:2003:i:1:p:133-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.