Author
Abstract
In southern Africa today, as elsewhere, expressions of psychological distress elicit a variety of explanatory frameworks and responses that continue to reflect the different discourses and practices of medicine, magic and religion. The assertion that these positions are historically constructed and contingent is an important theme in the study of healing, both of mind and of body. We know relatively little about African conceptions of mental illness in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but in researching the social history of mental health in Natal and Zululand, investigation of one phenomenon - the 'epidemic' of indiki spirit possession in Zululand from the 1890s to 1914 - has proved particularly illuminating. It shows that African concepts of mental illness were in a state of flux at this time as therapies for psychological distress adapted in the face of the entrenchment of colonialism, Christianity and a cash economy. Furthermore, African mental health strategies were not always as inclusive as has sometimes been suggested by scholars. This had very real consequences for a number of women - known as the amandiki - who were tried by the colonial state for the crime of witchcraft between 1894 and 1914. As the ensuing court cases revealed, colonial psychiatry was not simply or necessarily a blunt tool for social control. Instead, changing Western concepts surrounding, and responses to, criminal responsibility and mental illness posed legal problems for the colonial authorities in their attempts to distinguish between witchcraft, hysteria and spirit possession. An exploration of the histories of women and hysteria elsewhere in the world provides possibilities for a new understanding of the actions of the amandiki as attempts to achieve a state of mental health in the context of changing African healing practices.
Suggested Citation
Julie Parle, 2003.
"Witchcraft or Madness? The Amandiki of Zululand, 1894-1914,"
Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 105-132.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:29:y:2003:i:1:p:105-132
DOI: 10.1080/0305707032000060502
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:29:y:2003:i:1:p:105-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.