Author
Abstract
A consensus on South Africa's transition from apartheid is crystallising. According to it, the African National Congress (ANC) and the National Party (NP), which initially opened negotiations reluctantly and suspiciously, were subsequently transformed by the experience. They are said to have developed mutual trust, discounted questions of political power, and agreed to a constitution allowing the new democratic government — predictably headed by the ANC — to commence instituting its political programme. This piece takes exception to this on several scores. It maintains that considerations of power, which vanish from the conventional story, were central to the eventual settlement, and stresses two significant constraints on South Africa's new democracy. The government, as was anticipated by the NP, is exposed to relentless pressure to adopt policies preferred by capital, which exerts steady conservative influence on the ANC. Moreover, the terms negotiated in the interim constitution specifically protect the integrity of established bureaucracies, doubly constraining the democratic government. Conservative state interests fortify conservative economic interests, offsetting the social and economic radicalism of the ANC. The thesis presented here is that the political bargain in South Africa provides significant protections for interests associated with the NP and blunts the powers of the ANC. As a result, the ANC is struggling to satisfy promises of social transformation and is tempted to shift its political base from popular organisations to state bureaucracies. Thus, South Africa's political bargain is democratic in form, but is incipiently statist and conservative in substance.
Suggested Citation
Michael Macdonald, 1996.
"Power politics in the New South Africa,"
Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 221-233.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:22:y:1996:i:2:p:221-233
DOI: 10.1080/03057079608708488
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:22:y:1996:i:2:p:221-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.