IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v5y2001i3p325-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban renewal and regeneration in the Netherlands Integration lost or subordinate?

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Hulsbergen
  • Paul Stouten

Abstract

In this paper, Paul Stouten and Edward Hulsbergen revisit some of the on-going, and to some extent intractable, problems embedded in urban renewal and regeneration policies. In the context of the Netherlands, they argue that from the 1970s onwards there has been a growing disconnection between social and physical aspects of urban renewal. The particular problems the authors highlight include: the limited ways in which current problems are identified; the existence of numerous unconnected money flows; a shift in investment priorities, in particular away from public housing schemes; and the segregation of public authorities. The authors' overall concern is with the effects which unconnected, marketdriven urban renewal is having on less affluent residents. Stouten and Hulsbergen suggest that concepts such as the 'Network City' and the role of information and communication technologies, may provide new ways to 'reintegrate' urban policies. They also suggest that there needs to be more consideration of the scale at which many urban problems operate, and that more direct participation with residents, through for example an "active neighbourhood approach", can offer new solutions to old problems. Cities such as the Hague and Rotterdam are experimenting with such new problem statements for urban renewal. The question is: to what effect?

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Hulsbergen & Paul Stouten, 2001. "Urban renewal and regeneration in the Netherlands Integration lost or subordinate?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 325-337.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:5:y:2001:i:3:p:325-337
    DOI: 10.1080/13604810120105161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604810120105161
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604810120105161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaleen Singhal & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2009. "A Framework for Assessing Regeneration, Business Strategies and Urban Competitiveness," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(2), pages 111-124, March.
    2. Loretta Lees, 2008. "Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2449-2470, November.
    3. Thorsten Schuetze & Lorenzo Chelleri, 2015. "Urban Sustainability Versus Green-Washing—Fallacy and Reality of Urban Regeneration in Downtown Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Mark S. Foster & Edward D. Hulsbergen & Randall G. Shelden & Isobel Anderson & Stuart Cameron & Ngai-Ling Sum & Gerard Delanty & Pauline McGuirk & Donovan Storey, 2004. "Book Reviews," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1395-1411, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:5:y:2001:i:3:p:325-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.