IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v29y2024i4p436-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

iNIMBY? The potential of automated social media bots to create echo chambers in the online participatory planning discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Maxwell Hartt
  • Stephanie Cantlay
  • Justin B. Hollander
  • Ruth Potts
  • Alexander Seto

Abstract

Online participatory planning processes are cheaper, easier, and may reach a broader audience than in-person techniques. However, they are also vulnerable to disruption from automated social bots. This research introduces a bespoke planning-oriented social bot, Urbanist Uma, to explore if and how social bots contribute to echo chambers that may influence planning processes. After four years on Twitter, Urbanist Uma had almost 250 followers and her Tweets had been viewed tens of thousands of times. The high level of homophily in Uma’s network demonstrates the need for planners to recognize both the opportunity and risk of the digital public sphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxwell Hartt & Stephanie Cantlay & Justin B. Hollander & Ruth Potts & Alexander Seto, 2024. "iNIMBY? The potential of automated social media bots to create echo chambers in the online participatory planning discourse," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 436-448, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:436-448
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2024.2433650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2024.2433650
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2024.2433650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:436-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.