IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v23y2018i3p225-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsible cruise tourism and regeneration: the case of Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • John McCarthy

Abstract

Cruise ship tourism continues to grow faster than other tourism sectors globally, with increasing potential benefits for cruise destinations, which seek to boost tourism revenue for instance by developing passenger terminals and associated infrastructure. However, there is a growing awareness of the need for ‘responsible cruise tourism’ in view of the costs of cruise ship tourism to host communities. The case of Nanaimo in British Columbia, Canada, illustrates these issues in terms of the management of cruise ship tourism and associated socio-economic benefits and costs, with implications for policy and practice in other contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • John McCarthy, 2018. "Responsible cruise tourism and regeneration: the case of Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 225-238, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:23:y:2018:i:3:p:225-238
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2018.1428539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2018.1428539
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2018.1428539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Santos & Elena Radicchi & Patrizia Zagnoli, 2019. "Port’s Role as a Determinant of Cruise Destination Socio-Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:23:y:2018:i:3:p:225-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.