IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v40y2025i4p775-797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Zhu
  • Hal Pawson

Abstract

In early 2020, while China’s centralised governance response rapidly brought COVID-19 under control, tenure inequality and private rental sector precarity continued unabated. Drawing on stakeholder interviews in Shanghai, nation-wide renter complaints analysis, and a review of government pandemic reactions, this paper reveals the stark contrast between the neglect of renters’ rights and stringent public health measures. Under this prevailing governance model, renters’ wellbeing – including the right to secure occupancy – was effectively over-ridden during the COVID-19 emergency. This approach will have further degraded the reputation and appeal of rental tenure, detracting from state aspirations for greater equality between renting and owner-occupation – the Chinese Government’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative, ongoing since 2017. The study highlights how pandemic responses exacerbated existing housing inequalities and argues for proactive government commitments to protect marginalised populations’ secure occupancy and avoid accentuating tenure inequality during crisis periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Zhu & Hal Pawson, 2025. "COVID-19 as a disruption to China’s ‘tenure neutrality’ initiative? State-accentuated tenure inequality and rental sector precarity during the pandemic," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 775-797, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:775-797
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2024.2428742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:775-797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.