IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i8p2066-2094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of social mix and ethnic diversity in changing neighbourhoods: evidence from Glasgow and regeneration implications

Author

Listed:
  • Ade Kearns
  • Johanna Jokio
  • Phil Mason

Abstract

Perceptions of neighbourhood change have been an important area of inquiry for several reasons, including for their effects upon place attachment, mobility intentions, and links to mental and physical health. In this article, we take a different perspective by assessing residents’ perceptions of neighbourhood compositional changes relating to social class and ethnicity and considering them as potential pathways to other social and psychosocial outcomes. In addition, we examine how these relationships are moderated in situations where policy is a prime cause of neighbourhood change through state-led regeneration. Across deprived areas, perceptions of social mix are positively associated with residential satisfaction, community cohesion, and feelings of empowerment and safety. Perceptions of ethnic diversity are positively associated with empowerment and safety, and negatively with area reputation. In regeneration areas, perceived social mix is positively associated with most outcomes but perceived ethnic mix holds negative associations; neither appears to impact external reputations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ade Kearns & Johanna Jokio & Phil Mason, 2024. "Perceptions of social mix and ethnic diversity in changing neighbourhoods: evidence from Glasgow and regeneration implications," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 2066-2094, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:8:p:2066-2094
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2156985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2022.2156985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2022.2156985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:8:p:2066-2094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.