IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i8p1859-1886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Against the trend: evaluation of Nepal’s owner-driven reconstruction program

Author

Listed:
  • Lai Ming Lam

Abstract

Currently, owner-driven reconstruction (ODR) has become a default large-scale post-disaster housing strategy and particularly in resource-poor countries. The latest example is the 2015 Nepal earthquake reconstruction effort. Although an impressive amount of house rebuilding did occur, more and more families have rebuilt their homes as one-room or one-storey earthquake-safe abodes that barely fulfil family needs. In this paper, inspired by Lefebvre’s ‘production of space’ concept, I discuss how ODR has changed building construction in rural Nepal. I also argue that ODR followed a ‘trendy’ donor-preferred housing reconstruction strategy without seriously taking into account the implementation issues, particularly the paucity of effective approaches to mobilize people to rebuild their houses. Through a critical review of previous ODR cases and my ethnographic study of the Nepal earthquake, I find that five key elements of successful ODR practices are missing. These are organizational structure of reconstruction institution, technical support, public-private partnerships, policy communication, and support for vulnerable groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Lai Ming Lam, 2024. "Against the trend: evaluation of Nepal’s owner-driven reconstruction program," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 1859-1886, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:8:p:1859-1886
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2022.2159337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2022.2159337
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2022.2159337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:8:p:1859-1886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.