IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i11p2787-2805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing home injury: opportunities and barriers to regulating for safer rental housing in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Bierre
  • Michael Keall
  • Philippa Howden-Chapman

Abstract

Like many countries in the OECD, Aotearoa NZ does not comprehensively regulate or enforce the safety of rental housing, despite evidence that the significant scale of home injury can be reduced through cost-effective home modifications. We examine the framing of home injury in media, political, and organisational discourse to identify barriers to creating and enforcing laws for safer rental homes. We find progress in addressing safety via rental housing regulations is stymied, in part, by institutional arrangements that favour the framing of home injury as a product of individual behaviour and culpability rather than environmental risk, and the prioritisation of education and awareness-raising over regulatory and systemic interventions framed politically, as overreaching ‘nanny state’ policies. We propose opportunities to address the incidence of injury and inequities in outcomes and argue that effective regulation and enforcement will address the inherent power inequities in the rental sector between owner and occupier, which can influence the presence of injury hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Bierre & Michael Keall & Philippa Howden-Chapman, 2024. "Framing home injury: opportunities and barriers to regulating for safer rental housing in Aotearoa/New Zealand," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 2787-2805, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:11:p:2787-2805
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2224242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2023.2224242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2023.2224242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:11:p:2787-2805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.