IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v39y2024i10p2580-2605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Placemaking and public housing: the state of knowledge and research priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Elinor Chisholm
  • Crystal Olin
  • Ed Randal
  • Karen Witten
  • Philippa Howden-Chapman

Abstract

This article examines the international literature on placemaking – practices or initiatives that encourage a sense of place – in public housing communities. Placemaking is likely to be particularly beneficial to public housing tenants, and is a current priority for public housing providers; yet reviews of placemaking research have failed to consider public housing. Our systematic quantitative review of 63 English-language journal articles reveals that the field is dominated by qualitative cross-sectional studies conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, in the context of regeneration, and published in social science journals. Our thematic analysis of this literature shows that placemaking is supported by forming relationships and participating in community activities, by access to quality public space and amenities, and by spending time and forming memories in a place. The review therefore provides guidance to public housing providers and reveals the need for particular research, including longitudinal studies, and studies conducted in both redeveloped and existing communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Elinor Chisholm & Crystal Olin & Ed Randal & Karen Witten & Philippa Howden-Chapman, 2024. "Placemaking and public housing: the state of knowledge and research priorities," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 2580-2605, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:10:p:2580-2605
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2023.2206799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2023.2206799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2023.2206799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:39:y:2024:i:10:p:2580-2605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.